Undereye Polynucleotides vs Tear Trough Filler

Introduction
When it comes to treating dark circles and hollowness under the eyes, many patients immediately think of tear trough fillers. But fillers aren’t always suitable. At Dr Mirali Aesthetics, we offer undereye polynucleotides as a safe and effective alternative for our South London patients.
Tear Trough Filler – Pros & Cons
- Pros: Adds volume quickly, immediate results.
- Cons: Risk of puffiness, Tyndall effect (blue hue), not suitable for thin skin.
Undereye Polynucleotides – A Better Alternative?
- Regenerates Skin: Improves thickness and elasticity rather than just adding volume.
- Safe for More Patients: Especially those with pigmentation or very thin skin.
- Natural-Looking Results: Enhances quality of the skin, not just masking the issue.
Why South London Patients Choose Polynucleotides
Our Streatham and Sydenham Aesthetic Clinics see many patients who have been advised against tear trough filler. Polynucleotides are the perfect option for rejuvenating the area naturally.
FAQs
Which lasts longer, filler or polynucleotides?
Fillers give instant volume but polynucleotides provide long-term improvement in skin quality.
Can I combine the two?
Yes, in some cases a staged approach may be recommended by Dr Mirali.
Conclusion
If you’ve been told you’re not suitable for tear trough fillers, undereye polynucleotides may be the perfect solution. Book your appointment at our Streatham Clinic or Sydenham Clinic today.